Please Install Flash Player

Download from here

Download from here

- Popular Services
- News
- Articles
UK Dissertations Statistical Analysis Support Results and Discussions Chapter Dissertation Editing Thesis Writing Service SPSS Training Programm Dissertation Help India Questionnaire for Thesis SPSS Help Dissertation/Thesis Writers for the world UK Dissertations, Uk Assignments Dissertation proposal writing Three Engineering Thesis Completed by Dissertation India receive award UK Dissertations help Guidelines for UK Sept 2010 Submission Dissertation_Harvard Referencing Guide Sample Assignment of UK_ Retail Management Email Support Dissertation: What to undertake in Dissertation Completion Welcome_New Writers_Dissertation India Regression Research Methodology Questionnaire Development for Research Work IFRS Medical/Health Care Research Bio Statistics Law dissertations/assignments Management Information System_Dissertation Writing_Assignment Writing Thesis Writing Service Finance dissertation and assignment writing for UK universities. Bio Statistics Outsource Expert Thesis Writing and Editing Service quality Dissertation/Thesis Saudi UK Dissertations_Sample_Finance Thesis Help A Sample Research Methodology Part |
## Interpretive of Inferential StatisticsInterpretive of Inferential Statistics Home When you are working on a research paper, statistics which support your hypothesis are very important. Once you are done with the collection of data, the next crucial step is accurate interpretation of the same. Interpretive statistics allow inferences to be drawn about the similarities or differences between the sample and the population, or between samples or subsets of a sample. The Statistics Help and dissertation consulting services by Dissertation India guide you with this task, making it easy for you and saving time: Means » ‘t’ and ‘z’ tests. Variance » ANOVA. Distribution » Chi Square. Correlations » Spearman Rank correlation coefficient. This part is an indispensable segment of PhD Dissertation Consulting. Our statisticians prepare reports that are detailed and explain all aspects of the analysis, thus making the inference clear. This is how a sample report looks like: Factor analysis The factor analysis is carried out in SPSS and the output is given below: Total Variance Explained
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis. The table given above lists the Eigenvalues associated with each linear component before extraction, after extraction and after rotation. Before extraction, we can see 11 linear components. That is, Factor 1 explains 22.796% of total variance, Factors 1 and 2 jointly explain 36.718% of total variance and so on. Also, we see that subsequent factors explain only small variances. Therefore, those factors are excluded from the model (the factors for which Eigenvalues are less than 1). The factors which are selected for the model iteration are listed under the heading 'Rotation Sum of Squared Loadings'. Scree Plot The scree plot shown below indicates the point of inflexion on the curve. This curve is difficult to interpret because curve begins to tail off after two factors, but there is another drop after 5th factor before a stable plateau is reached. Therefore, we could probably justify retaining either one or four factors. Rotated Component Matrix
Rotation converged in 5 iterations. Component Transformation Matrix
Extraction Method: Principal Component Analysis. Rotation Method: Varimax with Kaiser Normalization. Discriminant Analysis Summary of Canonical Discriminant Functions Eigenvalues
First 1 canonical discriminant functions were used in the analysis. An Eigenvalue indicates the proportion of variance explained. (Between-groups sums of squares divided by within-groups sums of squares). A large Eigen value is associated with a strong function. . Wilks' Lambda
Wilks' Lambda is the ratio of within-groups sums of squares to the total sums of squares. This is the proportion of the total variance in the Discriminant scores not explained by differences among groups. A lambda of 1.00 occurs when observed group means are equal (all the variance is explained by factors other than difference between those means), while a small lambda occurs when within-groups variability is small compared to the total variability. A small lambda indicates that group means appear to differ. The associated significance value indicates whether the difference is significant. Here, the Lambda of 0.977 has an insignificant value (Sig. = 0.484); thus, the group means do not appear to differ. Canonical Discriminant Function Coefficients
Unstandardized coefficients A Canonical Discriminant function coefficient indicates the unstandardized scores concerning the independent variables. It is the list of the coefficients of the unstandardized distribution. Each subject's Discriminant score would be computed by entering his or her variable values for each of the variables in the equation. The canonical Discriminant function coefficients for REGR factor score (2 for analysis 1) and REGR factor score (3 for analysis 1) are greater than 0.5 Functions at Group Centroids
Unstandardized canonical Discriminant functions evaluated at group means 'Functions at Group Centroids' indicate the average Discriminant score for subjects in the two groups; more specifically, the Discriminant scores for each group when the variable means are entered into the Discriminant equation. The score for Local Convenience Store (0.122) is significantly greater than the Super Markets score (-0.187). . Classification Statistics Classification Processing Summary
Prior Probabilities for Groups
Classification Resultsa
59.5% of original grouped cases correctly classified. Classification results are a simple summary of the number and per cent of subjects classified correctly and incorrectly. The leave-one-out classification is a cross validation method, of which results are to be presented. Another Example report Hypothesis testing: In order to test whether there is a significant mean difference between the Fiscal Incentives and the cost of utilities, we carry out independent sample 'T' test. The null and alternate hypotheses are given below: Null Hypothesis: H0: μ1 = μ2 That is, there is no significant mean difference between the Fiscal Incentives and the cost of utilities Alternate Hypothesis: H0: μ1 ≠ μ2 That is, there is a significant mean difference between the Fiscal Incentives and the cost of utilities The output of the independent sample 'T' test is given below t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Equal Variances
From the above output table, we see that the value of the 'T' test statistic is 4.43152344 and its corresponding p-value is 1.4284E-05. |

Main Link

HomeMake an Online Payment Place Order Privacy PolicyContact UsSite MapNewsLetter Terms and ConditionsBlog

Dissertation Services

Dissertation WritingDissertation Topics Dissertation Editing Dissertation Help India Best Dissertation Writing ServiceDissertation ServicePhd Research Coaching PhD Dissertation Consulting

Thesis Services

Thesis WritingThesis Topics Thesis Editing Research Assistance Spss Help Research PapersStatistics HelpThesis Synopsis Writing

More Offerings

Conducting ResearchMBA ProjectsContent Development Bio Statistics Express Dissertation Medical Research Writing Guaranteed Grade Booster ServiceAssignment Writing

© Copyright 2008-2011 Dissertation India. All rights reserved.